Part XII · Strategy atlas · Chapter 12A
Choosing a strategy by purpose
Start from what you want the position to do
Parts V to XI built the pieces: the option contract, its Greeks, the dealers on the other side and the views a swing trader forms. Part XII is the atlas that joins them, about 58 named option strategies, each taken apart into its legs. This chapter is its front door, which starts from what you want a position to do rather than from the strategies you happen to know.
- The four primitive positions and their payoffs at expiry (Chapter 5A).
- The Greeks: delta, gamma, theta and vega (Chapter 5C).
- The IV percentile, which decides whether implied volatility is cheap or rich (Chapter 5G).
- The market thesis, the regime dashboard and the composite scorecard (Chapters 11B, 11A and 11G).
1 · How the atlas is built
Every options strategy you meet, in retail content or on an institutional desk, reduces to a combination of the four primitives of Chapter 5A, sometimes with a position in the underlying added. The primitives are the long call, the short call, the long put and the short put. The atlas catalogs approximately 58 named strategies, from the long call to the double diagonal, in four tiers of difficulty: novice, intermediate, advanced and expert (Chapters 12B to 12E). Within a tier, strategies are grouped by category: basic, income, credit spreads, neutral, calendar, debit spreads, directional, naked, ratio, ladders, synthetic, arbitrage and other.
Each entry gives the same things in the same order. It starts with the legs, the market view the position expresses, its maximum profit and loss, its breakevens and its net Greeks at entry. Where it adds something, it gives the dealer's side of the trade: who takes the other side, and why. It closes with the regime the strategy fits, its common variations, how it fails and a worked example with strikes, premiums and profit or loss.
The treatment is reference-grade, so read it as a lookup rather than a narrative. Three chapters follow the tiers: Chapter 12F maps market views to structures, Chapter 12G gives the margin each structure ties up, and Chapter 12H covers exercise and assignment.
Reading any structure: add the legs
A structure is a sum of legs, so its profit or loss (P&L) at expiry is the sum of the legs' P&Ls. Write for the underlying's price at expiry and for a strike. A call pays and a put , counted plus if you bought it and minus if you sold it. Add the payoffs, then subtract the net debit you paid or add the net credit you received.
Each payoff is a straight line with a single bend at its strike, so the sum is made of straight pieces that bend only at strikes. Measured per share, or per point of an index, the slope of the P&L at a price is
where is the net number of calls struck below (bought minus sold), the net number of puts struck above , and the number of shares held for each share an option covers, so a covered call has .
The slope tells you where to look: the maximum profit and the maximum loss sit at a strike, or far out at one end of the range. A profit or loss is unbounded only if the slope beyond the highest strike is not zero. Each breakeven lies on a sloped piece, where you can solve a straight-line equation for it.
Step 1: write the P&L. Buy a 6,000 SPX call for 35 points and sell a 6,100 call for 15, a net debit of 20 points. At expiry the P&L is .
Step 2: count the slopes. Below 6,000 no option is in the money, so the slope is 0. Between the strikes the bought call counts, so and the slope is +1. Above 6,100 the sold call cancels it, and the slope returns to 0.
Step 3: read the extremes. Below 6,000 the P&L is −20 points, the maximum loss of $2,000 on the $100 multiplier. Above 6,100 it is points, the maximum profit of $8,000.
Step 4: solve for the breakeven. On the rising piece between the strikes, gives a breakeven of 6,020.
Every formula in Chapters 12B to 12E comes from this counting. Where an entry gives no formula, as for calendars, the reason is that one leg is still alive when the other expires.
2 · The four-question filter
The strategies in the atlas are vehicles, not edges. Do not ask which strategy you know. Ask instead: "what am I trying to express, and which structure expresses it most cleanly given current conditions?" Read this section before you open any entry.
Before choosing a structure, answer four questions in writing:
- Direction: is your view bullish, bearish, or neutral (range-bound, or no view)?
- Conviction time horizon: does the view play out over days, weeks or months?
- IV regime: is implied volatility cheap, with an IV percentile below 30, normal (30 to 70) or rich (above 70)?
- Catalyst: is the view driven by a scheduled event, such as earnings, a Federal Reserve (FOMC) meeting or a Food and Drug Administration (FDA) decision, or by trend and structure?
The four answers typically narrow the 58 strategies to 1 to 3 candidates.
3 · The selection matrix
The matrix maps the answers to preferred structures. It has no column for the horizon, because the horizon sets the expiry of the structure you choose (Chapter 11M), not the structure itself.
| View | IV regime | Catalyst | Preferred structures |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bullish | Cheap | Trend | Long call; call debit spread; shares, or a LEAPS call as a poor man's covered call (PMCC) |
| Bullish | Cheap | Positive catalyst | Long call; call debit spread; call ratio backspread |
| Bullish | Normal | Trend | Call debit spread; shares; put credit spread |
| Bullish | Rich | Trend | Put credit spread, preferred over a long call when IV is rich; cash-secured put on XSP |
| Bullish | Rich | Positive catalyst | Diagonal call spread; put credit spread. Avoid long calls, which risk an IV crush |
| Bearish | Cheap | Trend | Long put; put debit spread |
| Bearish | Normal | Trend | Put debit spread; bear call spread |
| Bearish | Rich | Trend | Bear call spread, preferred; put debit spread |
| Bearish | Rich | Negative catalyst | Diagonal put spread; bear call spread. Avoid long puts |
| Neutral or range | Cheap | None | Long calendar or diagonal; long strangle, if the range is expected to break |
| Neutral or range | Normal | None | Iron condor, with extreme selectivity (Chapter 12C); credit spreads on either side |
| Neutral or range | Rich | None | Iron condor or iron butterfly at an extreme IV percentile; short strangle if margin permits |
| Long volatility: a move expected, direction unknown | Cheap | Imminent catalyst | Long straddle or strangle; ratio backspread |
| Long volatility | Rich | Imminent catalyst | Calendar or diagonal: long forward volatility while short event volatility |
| Short volatility: no move expected | Rich | None | Iron condor at an extreme IV percentile; short strangle; calendar |
Two names in the table recur throughout the atlas. A debit spread is a spread bought for a net payment, and a credit spread a spread sold for a net receipt. An IV crush is the fall in implied volatility once an awaited event is past, which cuts the value of every option bought before it.
4 · Four worked examples
Step 1: answer the four questions. SPX is at 6,000 with a composite signal of +45 (Chapter 11G), a VIX of 14 (an IV percentile of 25%), Stage 2 confirmed (Chapter 11E) and no imminent catalyst. The view is bullish, the horizon a two-week swing, IV cheap, and the driver the trend.
Step 2: read the matrix. The bullish, cheap, trend row gives a long call, a call debit spread, or shares or a LEAPS call. The call debit spread is preferred, for its defined risk and capital efficiency given the modest IV.
Step 1: answer the four questions. NVDA is at $700 with earnings in 4 days, an IV percentile of 92% and a momentum signal firing on the screen. The view is bullish, the horizon runs through earnings, IV is very rich and the catalyst is imminent.
Step 2: read the matrix. The row gives a diagonal call spread or a put credit spread, and says to avoid long calls. The diagonal call spread is preferred: long a back-month call, short a front-month call at a strike near the implied move boundary. The implied move is the at-the-money straddle's price as a share of the stock price (Chapter 11I). The diagonal captures the IV crush after earnings while keeping bullish exposure.
Step 1: answer the four questions. SPY is at $580 with a VIX of 28 (an IV percentile of 85%), a composite signal of +10 and an ADX of 30, an extended trend (Chapter 11C). The view is neutral because the composite is weak, with a 3-week horizon, rich IV and no catalyst.
Step 2: read the matrix. The row gives an iron condor or iron butterfly at an extreme IV percentile, or a short strangle. A defined-risk iron condor is preferred, because a composite of +10 is not strong enough to take a direction, while IV is rich enough to justify short volatility.
Step 3: size it, the critical step. Size very small, given the empirical underperformance of the CNDR iron condor index (Chapter 12C): 0.25% of the portfolio at risk, not 1%.
The two traditions this book draws on disagree about this example, and both positions stand. The atlas allows the condor at a quarter of normal risk. The Edge Book rejects systematic iron condors for retail accounts on the CNDR record, allowing only occasional, discretionary condors at extreme implied volatility, sized small (Chapter 10I). Whether a condor chosen for its regime escapes the systematic result is the open question between them (Chapter 10A).
Step 1: answer the four questions. AAPL is at $230 with an FDA-equivalent event in 7 days, here a product launch, an IV percentile of 70% and a screener flagging constructive momentum. The view is bullish, the horizon runs through the event, IV is elevated and the catalyst is imminent.
Step 2: read the matrix. An IV percentile of 70 sits on the line between normal and rich, which the example reads as rich. That row gives a diagonal call spread, long the back month and short the front month near the implied move, or a put credit spread.
Step 3: choose by the Greeks budget. For the most upside after the event, use a call debit spread sized small to absorb the IV crush. To trade a mispricing of event volatility, use the diagonal.
The last example steps outside its own row, since the matrix lists the call debit spread only where IV is cheap or normal. Read the matrix as a starting list, not a verdict.
5 · The selection tree
The figure turns the filter into a lookup, with one row of buttons for each question. Direction offers five answers: bullish, bearish, neutral or range, long volatility and short volatility. The horizon offers days, weeks or months, and the catalyst none, positive or negative. The IV regime offers cheap, normal or rich, labeled by IVp, the IV percentile: below 30, 30 to 70 and above 70.
The figure starts at bullish, weeks, normal and no catalyst, and lists the structures its rules recommend, ranked, with the preferred one starred. Change the horizon first, then try bearish with rich IV and a negative catalyst, and short volatility with normal IV.
| Recommended structures (ranked) | Note |
|---|---|
| ★ Call debit spread | Defined risk, capital efficient for cheap IV |
| 2. Long call | Pure directional; IV is cheap so premium is fair |
| 3. Shares + LEAP (PMCC) | If horizon extends to months |
| ★ Long call | Cheap IV + bullish catalyst = max convex upside |
| 2. Call ratio backspread | Tail-explosion bet for free or small credit |
| ★ Call debit spread | Balanced cost vs upside cap |
| 2. Put credit spread | Capture VRP on the bullish thesis |
| 3. Shares | If horizon ≥ weeks and IV not a factor |
| ★ Put credit spread | Sell the rich put-side IV; bullish exposure |
| 2. Cash-secured XSP put | Tax-efficient retail VRP harvest |
| ★ Diagonal call spread | Long back-month, short front-month near implied-move |
| 2. Put credit spread | Avoid long calls — vol crush risk |
| ★ Long put | Cheap IV + bearish thesis = clean expression |
| 2. Put debit spread | Defined-risk version |
| ★ Put debit spread | Balanced cost |
| 2. Bear call spread | Credit version if you don't want directional debit |
| ★ Bear call spread | Capture rich IV with capped risk |
| 2. Put debit spread | If you want directional debit despite expensive premium |
| ★ Long calendar / diagonal | Long forward vol; cheap entry |
| 2. Long strangle | If range is expected to break |
| ★ Iron condor | Defined-risk income; size small per CNDR empirical data |
| 2. Credit spread (either side) | Pick the side with richer skew |
| ★ Iron condor (at IVp > 80) | Sized very small; wing breaks dominate long-run |
| 2. Iron butterfly | Tighter zone, larger credit |
| 3. Short strangle (margin only) | Only if PM permits and kill rules pre-committed |
| ★ Long straddle / strangle | Cheap IV + imminent move = positive convexity bet |
| 2. Ratio backspread | Asymmetric long convexity for cheap entry |
| ★ Calendar / diagonal | Long forward vol while short event vol — captures the IV-crush asymmetry |
| ★ Long straddle | If a catalyst arrives |
| 2. Long calendar (back-month) | Vega-positive with controlled theta |
| ★ Iron condor at IVp > 80 | Defined risk; size small |
| 2. Short strangle (margin only) | Naked convexity for size; demanding regime check |
| 3. Calendar (sell front, buy back) | If term-structure is backwardated |
| ★ No clean fit | Re-check IV regime; short vol in non-rich IV is structural negative EV |
At the start the table lists a call debit spread, starred, then a put credit spread and shares. Changing the horizon changes nothing: the figure asks the question, but no rule reads the answer, as its caption says. The figure keeps the app's rules word for word. They differ from the matrix above in these places:
- Bearish, rich IV and a negative catalyst give the trend list, a bear call spread and a put debit spread, where the matrix gives a diagonal put spread and a bear call spread.
- Bullish, cheap IV and a positive catalyst give a long call and a call ratio backspread, leaving out the matrix's call debit spread.
- "Extreme" gets a number: the figure's condors are "at IVp > 80", where the matrix says only "at an extreme IV percentile".
- The figure ranks what the matrix only lists. It also adds a list for long volatility with normal IV or no catalyst: a long straddle, then a long back-month calendar.
- Where the matrix has no row, such as short volatility when IV is not rich, the figure answers "No clean fit".
Where the two differ, treat both lists as candidates and let the rest of the filter decide.
6 · Three principles that override the matrix
- Defined risk over naked risk for single-stock positions through an event week, always. The matrix may suggest a long call or a short put. If the position is on a single name through a catalyst, spread it: the short put becomes a put credit spread, and the long call a call debit spread.
- When in doubt, choose the simpler structure: a two-leg debit spread you understand executes better than a four-leg structure you sort of understand. Complexity has its own friction, since every leg crosses its own bid-ask spread (Chapter 2D).
- Match the instrument to size and tax bracket. Use XSP for retail swings on the index, SPX for size and the Mag-7 single names for momentum plays (Chapter 11L). Use anything else only if its liquidity is verified. XSP and SPX options are Section 1256 contracts, taxed 60/40 (Chapter 2E).
7 · The structure is not the thesis
Every strategy in the atlas needs five things before it becomes a trade. The first two are a market thesis (Chapter 11B) and a regime check against the dashboard and the composite (Chapters 11A and 11G). The other three are a conviction score (Chapter 13B), explicit sizing (Chapter 13C) and kill conditions committed in advance (Chapter 13C). The structure expresses the thesis without constituting it.
Choosing iron condors for their high probability of profit, without understanding the regime, is how retail traders lose money systematically over long horizons. The CNDR index, drawn against SPX in Chapter 12C, is the evidence, and Chapters 10I and 13F take it further. Choosing long straddles before earnings without analyzing the volatility surface (Chapter 5G) is how event-volatility traders give the entire risk premium back to the dealer.
The work that produces edge is in the four-question filter. The structure is just the wrapper.
The structure is the regimen, not the diagnosis. A treatment guideline narrows the regimens for a tumor once its histology, stage, biomarkers and the patient's performance status are known, much as the matrix narrows 58 strategies to one to three. The guideline cannot make the diagnosis. A regimen chosen because it is familiar, before the workup, treats the wrong disease. A structure chosen before the thesis, because it wins often, trades the wrong market.
Write the four answers down before you look at an option chain, with the IV percentile as a number rather than a word. Record the structure you chose and why the other candidates lost. Count the legs as a cost: a four-leg structure crosses four bid-ask spreads to open and four more to close. Each leg also adds a way for expiry to go wrong (Chapter 12H).
The filter is only as good as its answers. An IV percentile ranks today's implied volatility against the past 52 weeks (Chapter 5G), which does not prove that options are mispriced. The regime can change after you enter, turning a neutral view into a trend that breaks a condor's wing. The matrix also encodes preferences, not evidence: it says which structure fits a view, never whether the view has edge.
- Answer the four questions in writing before you choose a structure.
- Take the matrix row as a list of one to three candidates, then apply the three overriding principles.
- Do not trade the structure until the thesis, regime check, conviction score, size and kill conditions exist (Chapters 11B, 13B and 13C).
- For any iron condor, risk no more than 0.25% of the portfolio. Read Chapters 12C and 10I first.
Traders reach for the structure they have traded before and fit a view to it. The filter runs the other way, with the view first and the structure second. A trader who knows only iron condors finds a range in every chart.
- Every strategy is a sum of the four primitives, so its P&L at expiry is made of straight pieces that bend only at strikes, with slopes you can count.
- Four questions choose the structure: direction, horizon, IV regime and catalyst. The matrix narrows 58 strategies to 1 to 3, while the horizon sets only the expiry.
- Three principles override the matrix: defined risk on single names through events, the simpler structure when in doubt, and the instrument that fits your size and taxes.
- The selection tree keeps the app's rules, which differ from the matrix in a few named places.
- The structure expresses a thesis but never supplies one.
8 · Check yourself
Question 1
A call debit spread buys a 5,900 call and sells a 6,000 call for a net debit of 30 points. Use (12A.1) to find its maximum profit, maximum loss and breakeven.
Answer
The slope is 0 below 5,900, +1 between the strikes and 0 above 6,000. Below 5,900 the P&L is −30 points, a loss of $3,000. Above 6,000 it is points, a profit of $7,000. The breakeven is where , which is 5,930.
Question 2
You are bearish on SPX, the IV percentile is 80 and nothing is scheduled. Which structures does the matrix suggest?
Answer
The bearish, rich, trend row gives a bear call spread, preferred, or a put debit spread. The figure gives the same two, ranked the same way.
Question 3
You hold the same view, but with a negative catalyst ahead. Where do the matrix and the figure part ways?
Answer
The matrix gives a diagonal put spread or a bear call spread, and says to avoid long puts. The figure's rules return the trend list, a bear call spread and a put debit spread. Treat both lists as candidates.
Question 4
A short put fits your view on a single stock that reports earnings this week. What does the first principle tell you to trade instead?
Answer
The first principle puts defined risk over naked risk for single names through an event. Buy a lower-strike put against the short one to make a put credit spread, whose loss is capped at the distance between the strikes less the credit.
Question 5
Is a strategy that wins 85% of its trades worth choosing for that reason?
Answer
No, because a win rate says nothing about the size of the losses (Chapter 1C). Iron condors win often, yet the CNDR index lagged SPX by a wide margin (Chapter 12C). Choose the structure for the view it expresses, after the filter.